Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Oh Dear! ... Then Again...



Chanced across this news on the MusicPakistan website, posted on September 20. I have no idea if it is true or not, but don't say you weren't warned. If Mohammad Asif flunks his return match today, we will all know what happened...

Here is the item, reproduced warts and all:


Veena follow Asif to South Africa
Lollywood actress Veena Malik has obtained South African visa and will leave for Johannesburg from Islamabad to meet pace maker Muhammad Asif, reliable sources reported on Friday in Lahore. The sources revealed that Veena was going to South Afria to meet Asif as the bowler was already there for the Champions' Trophy.

Love affair between Veena and Asif was started in December 2008. Veena rejected the claim that she ever tied the knot with Asif, when her ex-boyfriend Babarak Shah pursued them. The scandal was revealed in the country's newspapers.

The sources said Veena would set for South Africa on Sunday night. She would celebrate Muhammad Asif's return to the national team there.

When Veena contacted, she told that it's her right to go wherever she wanted and that it's her personal life and nobody had right to interfere in it. "South Africa is a beautiful country and she often visits the country", she added.



On the other hand, if Asif shines, perhaps that pro-sex dossier by the Indian coach / physio makes sense after all!

On a completely different note, here's my take on the whole thing, for what it's worth... Losing today's match to Australia may not be such a bad thing in my book, because it would put us in second position in our group. Which in turn means we would be playing New Zealand (who are on top in the other group) in the semis. Now, regardless of the injury problems facing the Kiwis, if you recall, both times that we have won the World Cup (1992, T20 in 2009) we have faced New Zealand in the semis.

I just think it would be a good sign.

8 comments:

  1. You are comparing apples with oranges my friend. Both the companies are in completely different lines of business and are managed in a very different way. Just to give you a hint, profits of SSGC profits for the quarter ended 31st March 2009 were PKR 164 million (ROE: 1.68%)against UBL's whopping 2.535 billion (ROE: 5.5%).
    Might I also point out that UBL lay in shambles, plagued by infamous Aziz Memon and his goons, when it was acquired some 7 years ago. But soon after its transfer into the private hands, it became a locomotive for economic growth (not just UBL for that matter).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry mate. This comment was meant for your earlier post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. SK: Yeah, I guessed that much. Now I don't know where to post my response :) I think I'll post it to the right story and paste your comment there as well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The cricketing grapevine tells me that it was Asif's attempts to bawl as effectively as he bowls that led him to use all kinds of dubious potions. And Shoaib bhai was around to give him helpful advice on how to build up ALL his muscles. The younger man is believed to have quite an appetite!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Asif looks high in this picture (shock).

    he bowled a great second spell - I still think they should have let him bowl the last over, but you have a good point about playing New Zealand!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ooops. With ref to my comments on Asif above, let me correct myself before someone else humiliates me publicly. I obviously meant to say " Asif's attempts to ball as effectively as he bowls " and not " bawl as effectively..."
    Is there anything worse than getting your own punchline wrong? Should immediately get a job as a Geo ticker writer where I will obviously flourish

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think you forgot that we lost to NZ in semis of 2000 Champions Trophy :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Zag: oops, my bad... :)

    you are absolutely right of course. wish I'd remembered THAT! Not that any amount of trends-forecasting ever works with the Pakistan cricket team!

    ReplyDelete

It would be preferable if you left a comment without using the anonymous option, but it's entirely up to you.